Gambiaj.com – (Banjul, The Gambia) – Gambians Against Looted Assets (GALA), a fast-growing youth-led movement that has positioned itself as an anti-corruption watchdog, has announced the abrupt dismissal of three senior officials from its Central Committee, raising fresh questions about whether the movement is grappling with an identity crisis or undergoing a normal organizational shakeup.

In a statement released yesterday, GALA said it had “officially released” Mr. Ebrima Jallow (Secretary, also known as The Ghetto Pen), Mrs. Tida Jobe (Treasurer), and Mr. Ousainou Gambia (Logistics) from their positions, declaring their continued service “undesirable to the unity, integrity, and progressive mission” of the organization.

The terminations, taken under Section 5(4) of GALA’s constitution, were described as unanimous and “final,” with the officials instructed to immediately hand over all official documents and records to the Central Committee.

While the committee “acknowledged their previous contributions” and wished them success in future endeavors, the tone of the statement signaled a decisive break.

“GALA remains steadfast in upholding the values and principles upon which it was founded—principles that will not be compromised under any circumstance,” it said.

This is the second major leadership change within GALA in three days. On Wednesday this week, the movement’s national coordinator abruptly resigned, citing personal reasons but sparking internal debates over the direction and management of the organization.

Observers now question whether GALA – an anti-system movement born spontaneously out of widespread youth frustration with corruption and impunity – is experiencing an early “identity crisis” as it grows in visibility and influence, or whether the terminations reflect a deliberate effort to professionalize and safeguard its credibility.

So far, GALA has not publicly detailed the specific actions or behaviors that led to the dismissal of the three officials. The absence of explanations has fueled speculation among members and sympathizers, even as the group continues to organize campaigns and rallies against what it calls “systemic looting of national wealth.”

For now, the Central Committee insists the shakeup is necessary to “protect the struggle,” but analysts note that the movement’s ability to manage internal dissent without alienating supporters will be a key test of its staying power.